From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Josh Boyer <jdub@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@suse.de, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [patch 02/02] Debug option to write-protect rodata: the write protect logic and config option
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 15:20:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1131373248.2858.17.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1131372374.23658.1.camel@windu.rchland.ibm.com>
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 08:06 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 10:58 +0000, arjan@infradead.org wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been working on a patch that turns the kernel's .rodata section to be
> > actually read only, eg any write attempts to it cause a segmentation fault.
> >
> > This patch introduces the actual debug option to catch any writes to rodata
>
> Why a debug option? From what I can tell, it doesn't impact runtime
> performance much and it provides good protection. Any reason not to
> make it an always-on feature?
personally I'd like that but there is a chance of a tiny perf regression
and usually there are people objecting to that.
(It's not clear cut: while the last bit of the kernel no longer is
covered by a 2Mb tlb, most intel cpus have very few of such tlbs in the
first place and this would free up one such tlb for other things (say
the stack data) or even the userspace database), so it's not all that
clear cut what the cost of this is)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-07 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-07 10:56 [patch 01/02] Debug option to write-protect rodata: change_page_attr fixes arjan
2005-11-07 10:58 ` [patch 02/02] Debug option to write-protect rodata: the write protect logic and config option arjan
2005-11-07 14:06 ` Josh Boyer
2005-11-07 14:20 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2005-11-11 9:39 ` Coywolf Qi Hunt
2005-11-11 9:47 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-11-11 18:57 ` Coywolf Qi Hunt
2005-11-11 19:04 ` [patch] mark text section read-only Coywolf Qi Hunt
2005-11-11 19:09 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-11-11 19:34 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2005-11-12 14:01 ` Coywolf Qi Hunt
2005-11-11 21:43 ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-11 23:30 ` Nikita Danilov
2005-11-12 17:26 ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-12 14:32 ` Coywolf Qi Hunt
2005-11-12 16:34 ` Coywolf Qi Hunt
2005-11-13 4:50 ` Keith Owens
2005-11-14 13:34 ` Linh Dang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1131373248.2858.17.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org \
--to=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jdub@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®