From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mta22.hihonor.com (mta22.hihonor.com [81.70.192.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B1F3261B80 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2025 07:37:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=81.70.192.198 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755589025; cv=none; b=cnzYOtu2/62FxDBBOqajSbe54wLNHMh8RHf/0jB84XwQO2px4hU5rbXFOfSujb4CdG9yAscSNdqs0be2vSlOZKKsxGJw3EuFMKmzm8vDYfeLen0Q3OFvPxCt6SupaZ33ifQ7+TSl0j4FMD5ZunnhrDQxC3Ly1hXdw2qJkGiQETA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755589025; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yYZSZwcec65gWfwIp+ELzOzWwJe+gGNkYGuUS7q1d4c=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=u3nxnZ1HHNq8tUdXrEeuBD5/1k7AqJ91SeJeZMqyB34jgqN5B8B6X4QS19o+CNL6igzmoYoTZlcf9J9YRxAgnV6CA/0PqLWO63Wm34oTKxOJDt4MQJTjV1BeeR89atWb6D8ze94YyPuAJNDwCSnOhFGnEP5mbOkiNzFwY7yFVL0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=honor.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=honor.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=honor.com header.i=@honor.com header.b=B/7BNgA/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=81.70.192.198 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=honor.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=honor.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=honor.com header.i=@honor.com header.b="B/7BNgA/" dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=honor.com; s=dkim; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; h=To:From; bh=yYZSZwcec65gWfwIp+ELzOzWwJe+gGNkYGuUS7q1d4c=; b=B/7BNgA/lDCUoJDWeiuTbd1ovwwrFCsPzB3F+XIafZS0Tt21O0RFS2xDHn1wPz5ELKqNvPy+o nPC+EqXuhRnbXQxf7ld6+C/JQnzXV7s280B9nTC8/yTs1l3MjdCwnSRhP9dDUaptmazJurr+BgJ pTs8cGTyLYpruUw1ixAPT7Y= Received: from w001.hihonor.com (unknown [10.68.25.235]) by mta22.hihonor.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4c5hH73dBQzYl4L6; Tue, 19 Aug 2025 15:36:51 +0800 (CST) Received: from a004.hihonor.com (10.68.27.131) by w001.hihonor.com (10.68.25.235) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Tue, 19 Aug 2025 15:36:59 +0800 Received: from a008.hihonor.com (10.68.30.56) by a004.hihonor.com (10.68.27.131) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Tue, 19 Aug 2025 15:36:59 +0800 Received: from a008.hihonor.com ([fe80::aed1:4fa1:46bd:7de9]) by a008.hihonor.com ([fe80::aed1:4fa1:46bd:7de9%6]) with mapi id 15.02.1544.011; Tue, 19 Aug 2025 15:36:59 +0800 From: liuwenfang To: 'Peter Zijlstra' CC: 'Tejun Heo' , 'David Vernet' , "'Andrea Righi'" , 'Changwoo Min' , "'Ingo Molnar'" , 'Juri Lelli' , "'Vincent Guittot'" , 'Dietmar Eggemann' , 'Steven Rostedt' , "'Ben Segall'" , 'Mel Gorman' , "'Valentin Schneider'" , "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 1/3] sched_ext: Fix pnt_seq calculation Thread-Topic: [PATCH v3 1/3] sched_ext: Fix pnt_seq calculation Thread-Index: AQHb+VnBbe5K4qfqzkuJHukI3dznUrRoV6GAgADnpcg= Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 07:36:59 +0000 Message-ID: <1131ae6ff2834b57b71f0e41879bc83c@honor.com> References: <7ae16e02aba64a318d8e67be9e3b7f8e@honor.com> <46cef95e02d64b35a9d9d51d5debee22@honor.com> <6ccd5ef5752d4cc1818e152f6b3458b0@honor.com> <20250818174753.GA846072@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> In-Reply-To: <20250818174753.GA846072@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hello,=20 > This doesn't even begin to be an adequate changelog. >=20 > And please, don't put an out of line function call in put_prev_set_next_t= ask(. A changelog has been added accordingly in [PATCH v4 1/3], and __put_prev_se= t_next_scx() has been changed to an inline function. However, switch_class() called in __put_prev_set_next_scx() is difficult to= convert into an inline function in [PATCH v4 2/3]. look forward for your reply. -- Regards. Wenfang