mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Sluggish machine under 2.6.14 and 2.6.15-rc5
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 18:06:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1133978786.8096.52.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)

I've recently acquired some new hardware which I'd image to be fairly
standard - 3.0Ghz P4 (630?) HT CPU (800Mhz FSB),  Gigabyte 8I945P-G
motherboard, 1GB memory. I installed ubuntu and their 2.6.12-smp based
kernel was fine but didn't support all my hardware (this board has some
ip8212 ide ports). I therefore installed 2.6.15-rc5 which ran badly and
made the machine slow and sluggish. 2.6.14 shows the same speed issue.
2.6.13 runs just as well as 2.6.12 does. I'm using smp kernels to try
and take advantage of hyperthreading.

By slow and sluggish, I mean that the machine is generally lacking in
processing power and is also unresponsive to user interaction. Under
2.6.12/2.6.13 compared to 2.6.14/15-rc5:

* kernel compiles are at least twice as fast
* desktop menus are much more responsive
* bringing up dialogs e.g. to "Log Off" happens much faster 
* machine boots up much faster

The .configs and config differences:
http://www.rpsys.net/openzaurus/temp/desktop/config-2.6.13
http://www.rpsys.net/openzaurus/temp/desktop/config-2.6.14
http://www.rpsys.net/openzaurus/temp/desktop/config.diff

dmesg and differences:
http://www.rpsys.net/openzaurus/temp/desktop/dmesg-2.6.13
http://www.rpsys.net/openzaurus/temp/desktop/dmesg-2.6.14
http://www.rpsys.net/openzaurus/temp/desktop/dmesg.diff

dmesg.diff is probably the most interesting.

Is there a known reason I'd see so much speed difference between these
kernels? Is there something simple I'm missing here? 

Sadly, the later kernels are basically unusable.

I'd like to avoid a binary search but if that's the next step...

Richard





             reply	other threads:[~2005-12-07 18:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-07 18:06 Richard Purdie [this message]
2005-12-09 10:00 ` Richard Purdie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1133978786.8096.52.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=rpurdie@rpsys.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome