mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
To: Adrian Yee <brewt-linux-kernel@brewt.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tsc clock issues with dual core and question about irq	balancing
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 12:14:32 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1134591272.16294.3.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <GMail.1134551267.12292355.45625751005@brewt.org>

On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 01:07 -0800, Adrian Yee wrote:
> Hi John,
> 
> >> I'm currently testing the system with "nosmp noapic acpi=off
> >> clock=tsc" (it was losing interrupts and wouldn't boot properly
> >> with apic/acpi on) and so far everything seems to work (this
> >> includes ssh and desktop usage is better).
> > 
> > So keeping the above settings, does removing just the "clock=tsc"
> > cause the sluggishness to appear?
> 
> I just tried booting with the pmtmr enabled and incoming ssh is bad
> (I had an ls pause for over 20 seconds, while another connection was
> somewhat fine).  I wish I had more concrete tests since the problems
> I'm seeing are so subjective.  I guess I'll have to ignore this
> problem until I get a better test.

>From your dmesg, you're still running w/ smp, apic, acpi as well. I was
curious if you could run just as you had before without issue using 
"nosmp noapic acpi=off clock=tsc", only drop the clock=tsc bit.

I just want to be sure we're only changing one variable at a time. :)


> > Also would you open a bugzilla bug on this and attach your .config
> > and dmesg?
> 
> Done: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5740

Thanks for filling that out! I'll see if I cannot reproduce anything
similar using your config.


thanks again,
-john


  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-12-14 20:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-13  7:26 Adrian Yee
2005-12-14  1:04 ` john stultz
2005-12-14  9:07   ` Adrian Yee
2005-12-14  9:54     ` Jonas Oreland
2005-12-14 20:14     ` john stultz [this message]
2005-12-14 20:27       ` Adrian Yee
2005-12-14 20:57         ` john stultz
2005-12-14 23:47 ` Jeff Carr
2005-12-15  4:35   ` Adrian Yee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1134591272.16294.3.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com \
    --to=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=brewt-linux-kernel@brewt.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®