From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965284AbVLRWTL (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Dec 2005 17:19:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965293AbVLRWTL (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Dec 2005 17:19:11 -0500 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:48349 "EHLO gate.crashing.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965284AbVLRWTK (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Dec 2005 17:19:10 -0500 Subject: Re: USB rejecting sleep From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Greg KH Cc: Alan Stern , David Brownell , Linux Kernel list In-Reply-To: <20051218215051.GA18257@kroah.com> References: <1134937642.6102.85.camel@gaston> <20051218215051.GA18257@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 09:13:50 +1100 Message-Id: <1134944031.6102.103.camel@gaston> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 13:50 -0800, Greg KH wrote: > Yes it is, and I have a patch in my tree now that fixes this up and > keeps the suspend process working properly for usb drivers that do not > have a suspend function. > > Hm, I wonder if it should go in for 2.6.15? Do you have an URL I can send to those users to test ? Thanks ! Ben.