From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964958AbVLSUhT (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:37:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964961AbVLSUhT (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:37:19 -0500 Received: from a34-mta02.direcpc.com ([66.82.4.91]:17211 "EHLO a34-mta02.direcway.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964958AbVLSUhS (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:37:18 -0500 Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:37:01 -0500 From: Ben Collins Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.15-rc6] block: Make CDROMEJECT more robust In-reply-to: To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Jens Axboe , Ben Collins , akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-id: <1135024621.4541.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> Organization: Ubuntu Linux MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.5.3 Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <20051219153236.GA10905@swissdisk.com> <20051219193508.GL3734@suse.de> <1135021497.2029.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 12:02 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > for the eject case? That way we could do the patch as a pure cleanup, and > then a separate patch might change the singe "start_stop 2" with the more > complex sequence. > > (IOW, I'd prefer to separate out the cleanup from the "make the eject > sequence more complete" part). Sure thing. -- Ben Collins Developer Ubuntu Linux