From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751859Ab3KRV0w (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Nov 2013 16:26:52 -0500 Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:57556 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751301Ab3KRV0t (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Nov 2013 16:26:49 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Toshi Kani Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List , LKML , Linux PCI , Bjorn Helgaas , Yinghai Lu Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ACPI / hotplug: Fix PCI host bridge hot removal Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 22:39:25 +0100 Message-ID: <11362197.FWMPl6Gp0A@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.10.5 (Linux/3.12.0-rc6+; KDE/4.10.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1384798205.1791.14.camel@misato.fc.hp.com> References: <2434673.zhjYZOTQ4A@vostro.rjw.lan> <3206422.AfXMUDqMXZ@vostro.rjw.lan> <1384798205.1791.14.camel@misato.fc.hp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday, November 18, 2013 11:10:05 AM Toshi Kani wrote: > On Thu, 2013-11-14 at 00:16 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > Since the PCI host bridge scan handler does not set hotplug.enabled, > > the check of it in acpi_bus_device_eject() effectively prevents the > > root bridge hot removal from working after commit a3b1b1ef78cd > > (ACPI / hotplug: Merge device hot-removal routines). However, that > > check is not necessary, because the other acpi_bus_device_eject() > > users, acpi_hotplug_notify_cb and acpi_eject_store(), do the same > > check by themselves before executing that function. > > > > For this reason, remove the scan handler check from > > acpi_bus_device_eject() to make PCI hot bridge hot removal work > > again. > > I am curious why the PCI host bridge scan handler does not set > hotplug.enabled. Is this how it disables hotplug via sysfs eject but > enables via ACPI notification? It just doesn't register for hotplug at all. I guess it could set that bit alone, but then it would be quite confusing and the check is not necessary anyway. Thanks, Rafael