mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@firmix.at>
To: Christopher Friesen <cfriesen@nortel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FAT and Microsoft patent?
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:35:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1136993733.6547.168.camel@tara.firmix.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43C51D65.3030309@nortel.com>

On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 08:59 -0600, Christopher Friesen wrote:
> According to various sources, the USPTO has ruled that Microsoft's 
> patent on FAT is valid.

"ruled"? Isn't that the job of courts (and of course not of the
executive part of a government)?
And yes, there is another interpretation possible - justice is no longer
separated from the executive part.

And it is the job of the USPTO to grant patents and not to hinder them.

> Does this impact Linux?  Will we have to remove the filesystem?

There are lots of patents in the USPTO.
Have fun removing everything which is claimed by some granted patent.
It boils down or `rm -rf world`.

	Bernd, NAL
-- 
Firmix Software GmbH                   http://www.firmix.at/
mobil: +43 664 4416156                 fax: +43 1 7890849-55
          Embedded Linux Development and Services


  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-01-11 15:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-11 14:59 Christopher Friesen
2006-01-11 15:31 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-01-11 15:43   ` Ram Gupta
2006-01-11 15:46   ` Christopher Friesen
2006-01-11 15:59     ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-01-11 15:52   ` Roger Heflin
2006-01-11 15:49     ` Christopher Friesen
2006-01-11 15:57       ` Antonio Vargas
2006-01-11 17:48         ` Lee Revell
2006-01-11 16:12       ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2006-01-11 17:13       ` Rik van Riel
2006-01-11 17:20         ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-01-11 15:51     ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2006-01-11 15:35 ` Bernd Petrovitsch [this message]
2006-01-11 15:53 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-11 18:47 ` Jeff V. Merkey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1136993733.6547.168.camel@tara.firmix.at \
    --to=bernd@firmix.at \
    --cc=cfriesen@nortel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®