From: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
To: Nathan Lynch <ntl@pobox.com>
Cc: Chaitanya Hazarey <cvh.tcs@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Back to the Future ? or some thing sinister ?
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:03:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1137016986.2890.57.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060109040322.GA2683@localhost.localdomain>
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 22:03 -0600, Nathan Lynch wrote:
> Chaitanya Hazarey wrote:
> >
> > We have got a machine, lets say X , make is IBM and the CPU is Intel
> > Pentium 4 2.60 GHz. Its running a 2.6.13.1 Kernel and previously,
> > 2.6.27-4 Kernel the distribution is Debian Sagre.
> >
[snip]
> >
> > The problem is that, after a some time ( fuzzy , but I think like 2
> > hours ) of inactivity or because of some esoteric factor which triggers
> > a state in which the time on the machine starts going around in a loop.
> > if I do cat /proc/uptime, it goes 4 ticks ahead and again rewinds back
> > to the starting count ( not zero, but the moment in time when the event
> > was triggred. )
> >
> > The problem seems to be specific to the 2.6 series of kernel, not the
> > 2.4 series.
> >
> > I would like to know how to go about the debugging of the problem, and
> > that which specific part of the kernel will be directly interacting with
> > the rtc / system clock.
>
> Look into upgrading the BIOS on that machine; I've had similar
> problems on a IBM P4 workstation that were fixed in this way.
Yes, there was a problematic BIOS on some IBM P4 systems that after a
few hours messed up the apic's timer interrupt frequency. I believe
booting w/ noapic will work around the issue, but the correct fix is to
update your BIOS.
Please file a bugzilla bug if upgrading your BIOS does resolve the
issue.
thanks
-john
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-11 22:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-08 19:31 Chaitanya Hazarey
2006-01-09 4:03 ` Nathan Lynch
2006-01-09 15:26 ` Ram Gupta
2006-01-11 18:32 ` Chaitanya Vinay Hazarey
2006-01-11 22:03 ` john stultz [this message]
2006-01-12 14:33 ` Ram Gupta
2006-01-12 18:08 ` john stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1137016986.2890.57.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com \
--to=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=cvh.tcs@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ntl@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®