From: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Subject: [PATCH] disable lost tick compensation before TSCs are synced
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 14:29:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1138660164.10057.20.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
Avoid lost tick compensation early in boot before the TSCs are
synchronized. Currently timekeeping is enabled before the TSCs are
synchronized, thus when the TSCs are synched (reset to zero), it appears
that a number of lost ticks have occurred. This can cause premature
expiry of timers and in extreme cases can cause the soft lockup
detection to fire.
This resolves issues reported by Andy Whitcroft as well as bug #5366
reported by Tim Mann.
The new timekeeping work avoids this issue, but since it is not quite
ready for mainline, this patch would be a good idea for 2.6.16.
thanks
-john
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/timers/timer_tsc.c b/arch/i386/kernel/timers/timer_tsc.c
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/timers/timer_tsc.c
+++ b/arch/i386/kernel/timers/timer_tsc.c
@@ -45,6 +45,15 @@ static unsigned long last_tsc_high; /* m
static unsigned long long monotonic_base;
static seqlock_t monotonic_lock = SEQLOCK_UNLOCKED;
+/* Avoid compensating for lost ticks before TSCs are synched */
+static int detect_lost_ticks;
+static int __init start_lost_tick_compensation(void)
+{
+ detect_lost_ticks = 1;
+ return 0;
+}
+late_initcall(start_lost_tick_compensation);
+
/* convert from cycles(64bits) => nanoseconds (64bits)
* basic equation:
* ns = cycles / (freq / ns_per_sec)
@@ -196,7 +205,8 @@ static void mark_offset_tsc_hpet(void)
/* lost tick compensation */
offset = hpet_readl(HPET_T0_CMP) - hpet_tick;
- if (unlikely(((offset - hpet_last) > hpet_tick) && (hpet_last != 0))) {
+ if (unlikely(((offset - hpet_last) > hpet_tick) && (hpet_last != 0))
+ && detect_lost_ticks) {
int lost_ticks = (offset - hpet_last) / hpet_tick;
jiffies_64 += lost_ticks;
}
@@ -419,7 +429,7 @@ static void mark_offset_tsc(void)
delta += delay_at_last_interrupt;
lost = delta/(1000000/HZ);
delay = delta%(1000000/HZ);
- if (lost >= 2) {
+ if (lost >= 2 && detect_lost_ticks) {
jiffies_64 += lost-1;
/* sanity check to ensure we're not always losing ticks */
next reply other threads:[~2006-01-30 22:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-30 22:29 john stultz [this message]
2006-01-31 23:42 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1138660164.10057.20.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com \
--to=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®