From: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
To: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
Chintan M Patel <chintan.m.patel@intel.com>,
Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/fpu/xstate: Add more diagnostic information on inconsistent xstate sizes
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2023 11:22:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <113918f9-0e44-3d46-8b48-028277ec26bb@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230405183942.734019-1-fenghua.yu@intel.com>
On 4/5/2023 11:39 AM, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> A warning is emitted when xstate sizes are found inconsistent.
> But the warning message doesn't show enough information to diagnose
> the issue.
>
> Provide more detailed xstate size information to help debug the issue.
> As a hypothetical example, on a platform that may report incorrect
> xstate size in CPUID.0xd.1:EBX, the diagnostic information after
> the warning will show:
> [ 0.000000] x86/fpu: max_features=0x407
> [ 0.000000] x86/fpu: xstate_offset[2]: 576, xstate_sizes[2]: 256
> [ 0.000000] x86/fpu: xstate_offset[10]: 832, xstate_sizes[10]: 8
> [ 0.000000] x86/fpu: total size: 840 bytes
> [ 0.000000] x86/fpu: XCR0=0x7, IA32_XSS=0x400
> [ 0.000000] x86/fpu: kernel_size from CPUID.0xd.0x1:EBX: 576 bytes
>
> XCR0 | IA32_XSS is 0x407 which is consistent with max_features.
> CPUID.0xd.0x1:EBX should report the size of the xsave area
> containing xstate components corresponding to bits set in
> XCR0 | IA32_XSS. But it only reports 576 bytes of xsave area which
> doesn't count xstate sizes for AVX (offset 2 and 256 bytes) and
> PASID (offset 10 and 8 bytes). This confirms that the platform
> reports xstate size incorrectly through the CPUID bits.
>
> Suggest-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> Tested-by: Chintan M Patel <chintan.m.patel@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
> index 0bab497c9436..5f27fcdc6c90 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
> @@ -602,8 +602,37 @@ static bool __init paranoid_xstate_size_valid(unsigned int kernel_size)
> }
> }
> size = xstate_calculate_size(fpu_kernel_cfg.max_features, compacted);
> - XSTATE_WARN_ON(size != kernel_size,
> - "size %u != kernel_size %u\n", size, kernel_size);
> + if (size != kernel_size) {
> + u64 xcr0, ia32_xss;
> +
> + XSTATE_WARN_ON(1, "size %u != kernel_size %u\n",
> + size, kernel_size);
> +
> + /* Show more information to help diagnose the size issue. */
> + pr_info("x86/fpu: max_features=0x%llx\n",
> + fpu_kernel_cfg.max_features);
> + print_xstate_offset_size();
> + pr_info("x86/fpu: total size: %u bytes\n", size);
> + xcr0 = xgetbv(XCR_XFEATURE_ENABLED_MASK);
> + if (compacted) {
> + rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_XSS, ia32_xss);
This shouldn't be directly read here because of the LBR state component.
See the function comment:
* Independent XSAVE features allocate their own buffers and are not
* covered by these checks. Only the size of the buffer for task->fpu
* is checked here.
But, isn't that max_features bitmask pretty much about it?
> + pr_info("x86/fpu: XCR0=0x%llx, IA32_XSS=0x%llx\n",
> + xcr0, ia32_xss);
> + } else {
> + pr_info("x86/fpu: XCR0=0x%llx\n", xcr0);
> + }
> + /*
> + * In compact case, CPUID.0xd.0x1:EBX reports the size of
> + * the XSAVE size containing all the state components
> + * corresponding to bits set in XCR0 | IA32_XSS.
> + *
> + * Otherwise, CPUID.0xd.0x0:EBX reports the size of an XSAVE
> + * area containing all the *user* state components
> + * corresponding to bits set in XCR0.
> + */
> + pr_info("x86/fpu: kernel_size from CPUID.0xd.0x%x:EBX: %u bytes\n",
> + compacted ? 1 : 0, kernel_size);
Include Thiago who asked this.
Thanks,
Chang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-07 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-05 18:39 Fenghua Yu
2023-04-07 18:22 ` Chang S. Bae [this message]
2023-04-10 20:43 ` Fenghua Yu
2023-04-11 16:29 ` Chang S. Bae
2023-04-12 1:21 ` Fenghua Yu
2023-04-12 4:38 ` Chang S. Bae
2023-04-12 14:35 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=113918f9-0e44-3d46-8b48-028277ec26bb@intel.com \
--to=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chintan.m.patel@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thiago.macieira@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®