From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965017AbWBGLFb (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2006 06:05:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965020AbWBGLFb (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2006 06:05:31 -0500 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:55938 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965017AbWBGLFa (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2006 06:05:30 -0500 Subject: Re: DMA in PCI chipset -- module vs. compiled-in From: Alan Cox To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: Lee Revell , William Park , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <58cb370e0602070014p3d21c8a4u1ca3c5951892cf52@mail.gmail.com> References: <20060206034312.GA2962@node1.opengeometry.net> <1139200372.2791.208.camel@mindpipe> <1139255365.10437.49.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1139257535.2791.298.camel@mindpipe> <58cb370e0602070014p3d21c8a4u1ca3c5951892cf52@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 11:07:36 +0000 Message-Id: <1139310456.18391.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Maw, 2006-02-07 at 09:14 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > * chipset specific driver > > The most common mistake is to built-in ide-generic driver > and compile chipset specific driver as module... Oh that no longer works. That worked in 2.4, as it would take over the chipset. Didn't work if it was in use at the time but did work correctly if idle.