mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Sébastien Dugué" <sebastien.dugue@bull.net>
To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: preempt-rt, NUMA and strange latency traces
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 12:28:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1139311689.19708.36.camel@frecb000686> (raw)

  Hi,

  I've been experimenting with 2.6.15-rt16 on a dual 2.8GHz Xeon box 
with quite good results and decided to make a run on a NUMA dual node
IBM x440 (8 1.4GHz Xeon, 28GB ram).

  However, the kernel crashes early when creating the slabs. Does the
current preempt-rt patchset supports NUMA machines or has support
been disabled until things settle down?

  Going on, I compiled a non NUMA RT kernel which booted just fine,
but when examining the latency traces, I came upon strange jumps
in the latencies such as:


   <...>-6459  2D.h1   42us : rcu_pending (update_process_times)
   <...>-6459  2D.h1   42us : scheduler_tick (update_process_times)
   <...>-6459  2D.h1   43us : sched_clock (scheduler_tick)
   <...>-6459  2D.h1   44us!: _raw_spin_lock (scheduler_tick)
   <...>-6459  2D.h2 28806us : _raw_spin_unlock (scheduler_tick)
   <...>-6459  2D.h1 28806us : rebalance_tick (scheduler_tick)
   <...>-6459  2D.h1 28807us : irq_exit (smp_apic_timer_interrupt)
   <...>-6459  2D..1 28808us < (608)
   <...>-6459  2D..1 28809us : smp_apic_timer_interrupt (c03e2a02 0 0)
   <...>-6459  2D.h1 28810us : handle_nextevent_update (smp_apic_timer_interrupt)
   <...>-6459  2D.h1 28810us : hrtimer_interrupt (handle_nextevent_update)

or 

  <idle>-0     0Dn..   11us : __schedule (cpu_idle)
  <idle>-0     0Dn..   12us : profile_hit (__schedule)
  <idle>-0     0Dn.1   12us : sched_clock (__schedule)
  <idle>-0     0Dn.1   13us : _raw_spin_lock_irq (__schedule)
   <...>-6459  0D..2   14us : __switch_to (__schedule)
   <...>-6459  0D..2   15us : __schedule <<idle>-0> (8c 0)
   <...>-6459  0D..2   16us : _raw_spin_unlock_irq (__schedule)
   <...>-6459  0...1   16us!: trace_stop_sched_switched (__schedule)
   <...>-6459  0D..1 28585us : smp_apic_timer_interrupt (c013babb 0 0)
   <...>-6459  0D.h1 28585us : handle_nextevent_update (smp_apic_timer_interrupt)
   <...>-6459  0D.h1 28586us : hrtimer_interrupt (handle_nextevent_update)

or even

  <idle>-0     3D.h4    0us!: __trace_start_sched_wakeup (try_to_wake_up)
  <idle>-0     3D.h4 28899us : __trace_start_sched_wakeup <<...>-6459> (0 3)
  <idle>-0     3D.h4 28900us : _raw_spin_unlock (__trace_start_sched_wakeup)
  <idle>-0     3D.h3 28900us : resched_task (try_to_wake_up)


  There does not seem to be a precise code path leading to those jumps, it seems
they can appear anywhere. Furthermore the jump seems to always be of ~ 27 ms

  I tried running on only 1 CPU, tried using the TSC instead of the cyclone
timer but to no avail, the phenomenon is still there.

  My test program only consists in a thread running at max RT priority doing
a nanosleep().

  What could be going on here? 


  Thanks,

  Sébastien.




             reply	other threads:[~2006-02-07 11:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-07 11:28 Sébastien Dugué [this message]
2006-02-08  9:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-02-08 10:25   ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-08 10:47     ` Sébastien Dugué
2006-02-08 10:45   ` Sébastien Dugué
2006-02-08 16:49     ` john stultz
2006-02-09 11:11       ` Sébastien Dugué
2006-02-09 11:26         ` Sébastien Dugué
2006-02-09 18:54         ` john stultz
2006-02-10 13:07           ` Sébastien Dugué
2006-02-10 19:07             ` Lee Revell
2006-02-09  6:04     ` Lee Revell
2006-02-09 11:24       ` Sébastien Dugué
2006-02-09 20:02         ` Lee Revell
2006-02-10 13:18           ` Sébastien Dugué

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1139311689.19708.36.camel@frecb000686 \
    --to=sebastien.dugue@bull.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®