From: "Sébastien Dugué" <sebastien.dugue@bull.net>
To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: preempt-rt, NUMA and strange latency traces
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 12:28:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1139311689.19708.36.camel@frecb000686> (raw)
Hi,
I've been experimenting with 2.6.15-rt16 on a dual 2.8GHz Xeon box
with quite good results and decided to make a run on a NUMA dual node
IBM x440 (8 1.4GHz Xeon, 28GB ram).
However, the kernel crashes early when creating the slabs. Does the
current preempt-rt patchset supports NUMA machines or has support
been disabled until things settle down?
Going on, I compiled a non NUMA RT kernel which booted just fine,
but when examining the latency traces, I came upon strange jumps
in the latencies such as:
<...>-6459 2D.h1 42us : rcu_pending (update_process_times)
<...>-6459 2D.h1 42us : scheduler_tick (update_process_times)
<...>-6459 2D.h1 43us : sched_clock (scheduler_tick)
<...>-6459 2D.h1 44us!: _raw_spin_lock (scheduler_tick)
<...>-6459 2D.h2 28806us : _raw_spin_unlock (scheduler_tick)
<...>-6459 2D.h1 28806us : rebalance_tick (scheduler_tick)
<...>-6459 2D.h1 28807us : irq_exit (smp_apic_timer_interrupt)
<...>-6459 2D..1 28808us < (608)
<...>-6459 2D..1 28809us : smp_apic_timer_interrupt (c03e2a02 0 0)
<...>-6459 2D.h1 28810us : handle_nextevent_update (smp_apic_timer_interrupt)
<...>-6459 2D.h1 28810us : hrtimer_interrupt (handle_nextevent_update)
or
<idle>-0 0Dn.. 11us : __schedule (cpu_idle)
<idle>-0 0Dn.. 12us : profile_hit (__schedule)
<idle>-0 0Dn.1 12us : sched_clock (__schedule)
<idle>-0 0Dn.1 13us : _raw_spin_lock_irq (__schedule)
<...>-6459 0D..2 14us : __switch_to (__schedule)
<...>-6459 0D..2 15us : __schedule <<idle>-0> (8c 0)
<...>-6459 0D..2 16us : _raw_spin_unlock_irq (__schedule)
<...>-6459 0...1 16us!: trace_stop_sched_switched (__schedule)
<...>-6459 0D..1 28585us : smp_apic_timer_interrupt (c013babb 0 0)
<...>-6459 0D.h1 28585us : handle_nextevent_update (smp_apic_timer_interrupt)
<...>-6459 0D.h1 28586us : hrtimer_interrupt (handle_nextevent_update)
or even
<idle>-0 3D.h4 0us!: __trace_start_sched_wakeup (try_to_wake_up)
<idle>-0 3D.h4 28899us : __trace_start_sched_wakeup <<...>-6459> (0 3)
<idle>-0 3D.h4 28900us : _raw_spin_unlock (__trace_start_sched_wakeup)
<idle>-0 3D.h3 28900us : resched_task (try_to_wake_up)
There does not seem to be a precise code path leading to those jumps, it seems
they can appear anywhere. Furthermore the jump seems to always be of ~ 27 ms
I tried running on only 1 CPU, tried using the TSC instead of the cyclone
timer but to no avail, the phenomenon is still there.
My test program only consists in a thread running at max RT priority doing
a nanosleep().
What could be going on here?
Thanks,
Sébastien.
next reply other threads:[~2006-02-07 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-07 11:28 Sébastien Dugué [this message]
2006-02-08 9:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-02-08 10:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-02-08 10:47 ` Sébastien Dugué
2006-02-08 10:45 ` Sébastien Dugué
2006-02-08 16:49 ` john stultz
2006-02-09 11:11 ` Sébastien Dugué
2006-02-09 11:26 ` Sébastien Dugué
2006-02-09 18:54 ` john stultz
2006-02-10 13:07 ` Sébastien Dugué
2006-02-10 19:07 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-09 6:04 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-09 11:24 ` Sébastien Dugué
2006-02-09 20:02 ` Lee Revell
2006-02-10 13:18 ` Sébastien Dugué
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1139311689.19708.36.camel@frecb000686 \
--to=sebastien.dugue@bull.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®