From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932270AbWBUOcz (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2006 09:32:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932284AbWBUOcz (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2006 09:32:55 -0500 Received: from [81.2.110.250] ([81.2.110.250]:38081 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932270AbWBUOcz (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2006 09:32:55 -0500 Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] unexport install_page From: Alan Cox To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Hugh Dickins , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060221141341.GW4661@stusta.de> References: <20060220223709.GT4661@stusta.de> <20060221103808.GB19349@infradead.org> <20060221141341.GW4661@stusta.de> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 14:34:33 +0000 Message-Id: <1140532473.840.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Maw, 2006-02-21 at 15:13 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > This means it has only bloated the kernel for two and a half years > for nearly everyone. Wouldn't it be more productive to just shave 30 bytes off some other function and make it faster instead of moaning about every single export symbol that is provided even when its intentionally part of a complete API ?