From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Yi Yang <yang.y.yi@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [2.6.16-rc5-m3 PATCH] inotify: add the monitor for the event source
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 06:35:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1141882513.2883.2.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <440FBA9C.3050109@gmail.com>
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 13:18 +0800, Yi Yang wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 00:33 +0800, Yi Yang wrote:
> >
> >> Current inotify implementation only focus on change of file system, but it doesn't
> >> know who results in this change, this patch adds three fields to struct inotify_event,
> >> tgid, uid and gid, they will save process ID, user ID and user group ID of the process
> >> which leads to change in the file system, such software as anti-virus can make use
> >> of this feature to monitor who is modifying a specific file.
> >>
> >
> >
> > this patch appears to change the ABI! That is bad bad bad.
> >
> a change of struct inotify_event can't change ABI, can you describe it
> more clear?
it breaks ABI because this structure is communicated to userspace, and
you change both the layout and the size of it. What else would ABI
mean??
> > Also, how can you guarantee that "current" is valid and meaningful at
> > the place you use it to get the user id ??
> >
> Of course, current process/thread never disappears before fsnotify_*
> returns.
but... what makes you think it's not a kernel thread such as kjournald?
(which have basically meaningless current)
> > Also the process ID part is really bogus, after all the process may have
> > exited by the time the inotify client gets to it, and the PID may even
> > already have been reused.
> >
> >
> Your concern is correct, but uid and git can give out some hints, I ever
> considered to
> save the name of current process, however that needs a bigger and
> length-variable
> inotify_event struct, moreover, to get the full path name of current
> process/thread
> in kernel will have a big overhead, so I must select a comprise way.
there is no "full path name" concept in linux like that. And even worse,
many processes will not have *any* path because they have been deleted,
especially the viruses will use this ;)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-09 5:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-08 16:33 Yi Yang
2006-03-08 16:53 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-09 5:18 ` Yi Yang
2006-03-09 5:35 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2006-03-09 9:55 ` Yi Yang
2006-03-09 19:35 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-03-10 1:27 ` Yi Yang
2006-03-10 7:39 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1141882513.2883.2.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org \
--to=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yang.y.yi@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®