From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net,
nfsv4@linux-nfs.org
Subject: Re: [NFS] [GIT] NFS client update for 2.6.16
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 13:58:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1142967482.7987.83.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060321174634.GA15827@infradead.org>
On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 17:46 +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > commit 47989d7454398827500d0e73766270986a3b488f
> > Author: Chuck Lever <cel@netapp.com>
> > Date: Mon Mar 20 13:44:32 2006 -0500
> >
> > NFS: remove support for multi-segment iovs in the direct write path
> >
> > Eliminate the persistent use of automatic storage in all parts of the
> > NFS client's direct write path to pave the way for introducing support
> > for aio against files opened with the O_DIRECT flag.
>
> NACK. We have patches pending that consolidate ->aio_read/write and
> ->read/writev into one operation. this change is completely counterproductive
> towards that goal which has been discussed on -fsdevel for a while.
Could you, BTW, please post these pending patches? They are clearly not
in -mm, since these patches have been there for some time without
conflicting with anything else. The only references I could find were to
the following thread:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.file-systems/7748
which basically just adds a BUG() if you call NFS O_DIRECT with a
multi-segment iovec.
I can't see from those patches how Chuck's O_DIRECT changes can be
construed as being "counterproductive". AFAICS those changes are
completely orthogonal to your proposal.
Cheers,
Trond
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-21 18:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-21 17:11 Trond Myklebust
2006-03-21 17:46 ` [NFS] " Christoph Hellwig
2006-03-21 18:03 ` Chuck Lever
2006-03-21 18:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-03-21 18:08 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-03-21 18:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-03-21 19:06 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-03-21 19:12 ` Chuck Lever
2006-03-22 10:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-03-22 11:35 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-03-21 18:58 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2006-03-22 10:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-03-21 17:50 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-21 18:12 ` Trond Myklebust
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1142967482.7987.83.camel@lade.trondhjem.org \
--to=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=nfsv4@linux-nfs.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®