From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751102AbWCVJBQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Mar 2006 04:01:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751132AbWCVJBQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Mar 2006 04:01:16 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:38038 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751102AbWCVJBP (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Mar 2006 04:01:15 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add full sysfs support to the IPMI driver From: Arjan van de Ven To: minyard@acm.org Cc: greg@kroah.com, Linux Kernel , Andrew Morton , Yani Ioannou In-Reply-To: <20060321221328.GB27436@i2.minyard.local> References: <20060321221328.GB27436@i2.minyard.local> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:01:09 +0100 Message-Id: <1143018069.2955.43.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 16:13 -0600, Corey Minyard wrote: > +static void ipmi_bmc_release(struct device *dev) > +{ > + printk(KERN_DEBUG "ipmi_bmc release\n"); > +} eehhhh NO. Please read the many comments and documentations about why a release function is NOT allowed to be empty. In fact the kernel warned you about that, didn't it?