From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932224AbWDFS7g (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Apr 2006 14:59:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932223AbWDFS7g (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Apr 2006 14:59:36 -0400 Received: from blackbird.sr71.net ([64.146.134.44]:27779 "EHLO blackbird.sr71.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932125AbWDFS7f (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Apr 2006 14:59:35 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix pciehp driver on non ACPI systems From: Dave Hansen To: Greg KH Cc: "Randy.Dunlap" , anton@samba.org, akpm@osdl.org, gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060406182722.GA31712@kroah.com> References: <20060406101731.GA9989@krispykreme> <20060406160527.GA2965@kroah.com> <20060406104113.08311cdc.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <20060406182722.GA31712@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 11:58:58 -0700 Message-Id: <1144349938.9731.185.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 11:27 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > Would that solve this issue? I'm guessing that they are being included > as it needs something in those headers... There's another #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI area in the .c file. I doubt anything else in there really needs ACPI. Maybe the #ifdef'd area could go into its own _acpi.c file? -- Dave