From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Alessandro Suardi <alessandro.suardi@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 40% IDE performance regression going from FC3 to FC5 with same kernel
Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2006 18:36:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1144514167.2989.10.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5a4c581d0604080927g532b6d10y7992d9adb4e63d08@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 18:27 +0200, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> On 4/8/06, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Just for the record - no, even rebuilding same kernel with same GCC
> > > (3.4.4) under FC5, disk performance is much slower than FC3 -
> > > according to hdparm _and_ dd tests.
> >
> > what happens if you kill hald and other inotify using animals?
>
> Thanks Arjan for looking into this.
>
> Stopping hald brings hdparm from 18.5MB/s to 20MB/s, which is
> indeed a noticeable improvement, though still far from the FC3
> performance. I'm unsure what else can be stopped however
> from this process list:
>
> 274 ? S<s 0:00 /sbin/udevd -d
try killing that one next; it may or may not help but it's sure worth a
try (esp given the success of the first kill :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-08 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-08 14:47 Alessandro Suardi
2006-04-08 15:34 ` Alessandro Suardi
2006-04-08 15:45 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-04-08 16:27 ` Alessandro Suardi
2006-04-08 16:36 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2006-04-08 17:07 ` Alessandro Suardi
2006-04-11 11:26 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-04-11 18:04 ` Alessandro Suardi
2006-04-11 18:41 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-04-11 12:28 ` Andreas Mohr
2006-04-11 18:11 ` Alessandro Suardi
2006-04-11 18:43 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-04-11 19:49 ` Alessandro Suardi
2006-04-11 22:06 ` Alessandro Suardi
2006-04-11 19:31 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1144514167.2989.10.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org \
--to=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=alessandro.suardi@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®