From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751173AbWDJUWd (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Apr 2006 16:22:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751178AbWDJUWd (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Apr 2006 16:22:33 -0400 Received: from ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.56]:56201 "EHLO ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751173AbWDJUWc (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Apr 2006 16:22:32 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH -rt] Buggy uart (for 2.6.16) From: Steven Rostedt To: Gunther Mayer Cc: LKML In-Reply-To: <443A8D70.3040906@gmx.net> References: <1144676225.12145.30.camel@localhost.localdomain> <443A8D70.3040906@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 16:22:26 -0400 Message-Id: <1144700546.11958.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 18:53 +0200, Gunther Mayer wrote: > > > > > Can you name the exact 8250 model which is buggy ? > I just found some more information. The board's chipset is an Intel 440BX. I think this is responsible for the uarts. -- Steve