From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750994AbWDKU5N (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Apr 2006 16:57:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750997AbWDKU5N (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Apr 2006 16:57:13 -0400 Received: from ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.55]:3010 "EHLO ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750989AbWDKU5N (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Apr 2006 16:57:13 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH -rt] Buggy uart (for 2.6.16) From: Steven Rostedt To: Gunther Mayer Cc: LKML , Ingo Molnar In-Reply-To: <443A8D70.3040906@gmx.net> References: <1144676225.12145.30.camel@localhost.localdomain> <443A8D70.3040906@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 16:57:00 -0400 Message-Id: <1144789020.14313.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 18:53 +0200, Gunther Mayer wrote: > > > Can you name the exact 8250 model which is buggy ? > >>From the spec: COM1 und COM2 werden mittels der Ultra IO FDC37C675 implementiert. COM3 und COM4 sind 16C550 oder kompatible. I'm using COM1 and COM2 so it's the Ultra IO FDC37C675. -- Steve