From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751044AbWDLJAv (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2006 05:00:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751029AbWDLJAv (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2006 05:00:51 -0400 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:31369 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751011AbWDLJAu (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2006 05:00:50 -0400 Subject: Re: libata-pata works on ICH4-M From: Alan Cox To: Jan Engelhardt Cc: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: <443B9EBB.6010607@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 10:09:50 +0100 Message-Id: <1144832990.1952.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Maw, 2006-04-11 at 20:46 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > So libata has the overhead of using SCSI commands? At least > that's what it suggests to the normal user. libata issues standard ATA commands to disks and CF cards, and ATAPI to other devices. The current tree knows how to use LBA28 commands opportunistically so its generating basically the same command stream as the old IDE layer