From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932187AbWDOXll (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Apr 2006 19:41:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932189AbWDOXll (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Apr 2006 19:41:41 -0400 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:38826 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932187AbWDOXlk (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Apr 2006 19:41:40 -0400 Subject: Re: SATA Conflict with PATA DMA From: Alan Cox To: Robert Hancock Cc: linux-kernel , Bill Waddington In-Reply-To: <444182B3.4050608@shaw.ca> References: <61Y0s-AN-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <61UzA-43O-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <61Y0s-AN-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <61Y0s-AN-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <444182B3.4050608@shaw.ca> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 00:51:02 +0100 Message-Id: <1145145062.32107.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sad, 2006-04-15 at 17:33 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote: > The other way around is to make libata handle the PATA devices. I'm not > sure if the support for that on combined mode is in mainline or if you > need Alan's libata PATA patch for that? There should be enough in 2.6.17-rc1 to just add the needed PCI identifiers for recent chips to work SATA/PATA. There are some ugly bugs left in the base code that the -ac patches fix in ata_piix but the core stuff needed is in the base tree