From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750719AbWDRJXx (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Apr 2006 05:23:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750773AbWDRJXw (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Apr 2006 05:23:52 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:44517 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750719AbWDRJXw (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Apr 2006 05:23:52 -0400 Subject: Re: Question on Schedule and Preemption From: Arjan van de Ven To: Andreas Mohr Cc: Liu haixiang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060418091724.GA7258@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de> References: <20060418091724.GA7258@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 11:23:47 +0200 Message-Id: <1145352228.2976.18.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > If the current task is running and thus not yet exiting (!current->exit_state) > and is also in an atomic code section (i.e. under lock), it shouldn't call > any reschedule function (which also happens by just calling msleep(): use > mdelay() instead in that case!). > actually don't use mdelay, but change your code so that you CAN sleep :)