From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750868AbWDSLQa (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Apr 2006 07:16:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750878AbWDSLQa (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Apr 2006 07:16:30 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:45967 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750859AbWDSLQ3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Apr 2006 07:16:29 -0400 Subject: [Fwd: Re: 3w-9xxx status in kernel] From: Arjan van de Ven To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Martin Honermeyer Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:16:27 +0200 Message-Id: <1145445387.3085.27.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org -------- Forwarded Message -------- > From: Martin Honermeyer > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: 3w-9xxx status in kernel > Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:02:42 +0200 > > Hi, > > same problem over here. Why does the newest kernel contain an old version of > the 3w-9xxx driver? because nobody bothered to submit it?? > > We are having performance problems using a 9550SX controller. Read > throughput (measured with hdparm) hdparm is not a good measurement tool at all for performance. At least use something like tiobench (tiobench.sf.net)