From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750976AbWDSSO0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:14:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751028AbWDSSO0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:14:26 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:51902 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750947AbWDSSOZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:14:25 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/11] security: AppArmor - Overview From: Arjan van de Ven To: Tony Jones Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chrisw@sous-sol.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060419174905.29149.67649.sendpatchset@ermintrude.int.wirex.com> References: <20060419174905.29149.67649.sendpatchset@ermintrude.int.wirex.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 20:14:22 +0200 Message-Id: <1145470463.3085.86.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 10:49 -0700, Tony Jones wrote: > Attached patches to include the AppArmor application security module in > the linux kernel. can you at least comment on the discussion that happened on lkml the past few days where basically most people understood and agreed that a path-based approach is just not possible in linux anymore... you must have a good defense against that argument, so I'm curious to hear what it is