From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750753AbWDTImH (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2006 04:42:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750748AbWDTImH (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2006 04:42:07 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:33515 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750716AbWDTImF (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2006 04:42:05 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/11] security: AppArmor - Overview From: Arjan van de Ven To: Andi Kleen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chrisw@sous-sol.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: <20060419174905.29149.67649.sendpatchset@ermintrude.int.wirex.com> <1145470463.3085.86.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 10:42:03 +0200 Message-Id: <1145522524.3023.12.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 00:32 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > Arjan van de Ven writes: > > > > you must have a good defense against that argument, so I'm curious to > > hear what it is > > [I'm not from the apparmor people but my understanding is] > > Usually they claimed name spaces as the reason it couldn't work. I actually posted a list of 10 things that I made up in 3 minutes; just going over those 10 would be a good start already since they're the most obvious ones..