From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750748AbWDTOLZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2006 10:11:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750766AbWDTOLZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2006 10:11:25 -0400 Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.151]:62932 "EHLO e33.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750748AbWDTOLY (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2006 10:11:24 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: fix missing string From: Kylene Jo Hall To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel , TPM Device Driver List In-Reply-To: <20060420005938.6c3d4319.akpm@osdl.org> References: <1145474021.4894.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060420005938.6c3d4319.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 09:07:22 -0500 Message-Id: <1145542042.4894.33.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 (2.0.4-7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 00:59 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Kylene Jo Hall wrote: > > > > A string corresponding to the tcpa_pc_event_id POST_CONTENTS was missing > > causing an overflow bug when access was attempted in the get_event_name > > function. > > These last two bugs are applicable to 2.6.17. Correct. > > I'm kind of thinking of pushing all the TPM patches into 2.6.17 actually. > Although there's quite a lot of feature work in there, we also have > bugfixes, although relatively minor ones. > > What's your confidence level in those patches? > Would you have time to do a decent round of regression testing against the > resulting TPM code prior to 2.6.17? Say, inside the next couple of weeks? I'm pretty confident. Yesterday's bug fixes were the last things I know of that needed attention. I'd be happy to run regression testing in the next couple of weeks. Thanks, Kylie