From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932085AbWDWW1e (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Apr 2006 18:27:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932084AbWDWW1e (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Apr 2006 18:27:34 -0400 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([194.106.48.114]:5608 "EHLO tim.rpsys.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932085AbWDWW1d (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Apr 2006 18:27:33 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] [LEDS] Amstrad Delta LED support From: Richard Purdie To: Jonathan McDowell , Andrew Morton Cc: Ben Dooks , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, e3-hacking@earth.li In-Reply-To: <20060423221453.GU7570@earth.li> References: <20060422130823.GP7570@earth.li> <20060423123850.GA18923@home.fluff.org> <20060423221453.GU7570@earth.li> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 23:27:18 +0100 Message-Id: <1145831239.6744.33.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 23:14 +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 01:38:50PM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 02:08:23PM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > > > [Which tree should I be trying to submit this to? The patch is > > > against and works fine with 2.6.17-rc2] > > I prefer the following PM defines, so there is only one block of > > CONFIG_PM > > Seems reasonable; leds-spitz has the two blocks and that's what I'd used > as inspiration. Revised version below. > > > > Use the new LED infrastructure to support the 6 LEDs present on the > Amstrad Delta. > > Signed-Off-By: Jonathan McDowell Acked-By: Richard Purdie