From: Tom Horsley <tom.horsley@ccur.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: bugsy <bugsy@ccur.com>
Subject: CLONE_NEWNS and mount command?
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 08:57:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1146142640.23667.9.camel@tweety> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 965 bytes --]
I stumbled across the CLONE_NEWNS flag in the clone() man page and
thought I'd see if I could write a program that would let me do things
like run an sshd on my machine in a different "namespace" created
before any network filesystems were mounted (so I could run rpm
commands without NFS timeouts, etc).
In my experiments though, I got very confused. I created the attached
program, used it to exec an xterm, then in that xterm unmounted
a NFS filesystem.
It disappeared from the mounts listed by the "mount" command
in both the old and new namespace, but if I attempted to remount
the system in the old namespace I get an error telling me it is
already mounted (even though it doesn't show up). In the new
namespace where I unmounted it, I can remount it (then it shows
up again in the mount listing in both namespaces).
Should the /proc/mounts file be paying more attention to this
"namespace" thing? Is this a bug, or just the way things happen
to work out?
[-- Attachment #2: nomounts.c --]
[-- Type: text/x-csrc, Size: 917 bytes --]
/* Run a process in a new "namespace".
*/
#include <sched.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#define STACK_SIZE ((20*4096)/sizeof(double))
static double stack_space[STACK_SIZE];
int
do_new_namespace(void * arg) {
char ** argv = (char **)arg;
execvp(argv[0], argv);
perror("execvp");
_exit(2);
}
int
main(int argc, char ** argv) {
int clone_id;
int wstat;
pid_t kid;
clone_id = clone(do_new_namespace, &stack_space[STACK_SIZE-2], CLONE_NEWNS,
(void *)(argv + 1));
if (clone_id == -1) {
perror("clone");
_exit(2);
}
kid = waitpid((pid_t)clone_id, &wstat, 0);
if (kid == (pid_t)-1) {
perror("waitpid");
_exit(2);
}
if ((kid == (pid_t)clone_id) && WIFEXITED(wstat)) {
_exit(WEXITSTATUS(wstat));
} else {
_exit(2);
}
}
next reply other threads:[~2006-04-27 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-27 12:57 Tom Horsley [this message]
2006-04-27 13:01 ` Al Viro
2006-04-27 13:05 ` Tom Horsley
2006-04-27 14:49 ` Michael Tokarev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1146142640.23667.9.camel@tweety \
--to=tom.horsley@ccur.com \
--cc=bugsy@ccur.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome