From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751762AbWD0XIM (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:08:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751763AbWD0XIM (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:08:12 -0400 Received: from accolon.hansenpartnership.com ([64.109.89.108]:12161 "EHLO accolon.hansenpartnership.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751762AbWD0XIL (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:08:11 -0400 Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] let X86_VOYAGER depend on SMP From: James Bottomley To: Andrew Morton Cc: Adrian Bunk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060427160604.66b2a297.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20060427203350.GR3570@stusta.de> <20060427160604.66b2a297.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 18:08:06 -0500 Message-Id: <1146179286.3528.54.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-4.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 16:06 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Adrian Bunk wrote: > I was kinda waiting for James to express an opinion. In theory it'd be > better to make uniproc-on-Voyager build, boot and run like the wind. I do have making uniprocessor build work on my todo list. There are actually a surprising number of non-smp machines out their (mainly 3360s). James