mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [Bug 417] New: htree much slower than regular ext3
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 09:31:03 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <11490000.1046367063@[10.10.2.4]> (raw)

http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417

           Summary: htree much slower than regular ext3
    Kernel Version: 2.5.63-bk3
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
             Owner: akpm@digeo.com
         Submitter: bwindle-kbt@fint.org


Distribution: Debian Testing

Hardware Environment: x86, 256mb RAM, PIIX4, Maxtor 91728D8 ATA DISK drive

Software Environment: 
Linux razor 2.5.63bk3 #25 Thu Feb 27 10:13:35 EST 2003 i686 Pentium II 
(Klamath) GenuineIntel GNU/Linux

Gnu C                  2.95.4
Gnu make               3.79.1
util-linux             2.11n
mount                  2.11n
module-init-tools      implemented
e2fsprogs              1.30-WIP
reiserfsprogs          3.6.3
Linux C Library        2.2.5
Dynamic linker (ldd)   2.2.5
Procps                 2.0.7
Net-tools              1.60
Console-tools          0.2.3
Sh-utils               4.5.2

Problem Description:
I created a directory ("test") with 32000 (ok, 31998) directories in it,
and  put a file called 'foo' in each of them (for i in `ls`; do cd $i &&
touch bar  && cd .. ; done). Then I took that ext3 partion, umounted it,
did a 'tune2fs -O  dir_index', then 'fsck -fD', and remounted. I then did a
'time du -hs' on the  test directory, and here are the results.

ext3+htree:     
bwindle@razor:/giant/inodes$ time du -hs
126M    .

real    7m21.756s
user    0m2.021s
sys     0m22.190s

I then unmounted, tune2fs -O ^dir_index, e2fsck -fD /dev/hdb1, remounted,
and  did another du -hs on the test directory. It took 1 minute, 48 seconds.

bwindle@razor:/giant/test$ time du -hs
126M    .

real    1m48.760s
user    0m1.986s
sys     0m21.563s


I thought htree was supposed to speed up access with large numbers of 
directories?



             reply	other threads:[~2003-02-27 17:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-27 17:31 Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2003-02-28  2:55 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-02-27 21:00   ` Andreas Dilger
2003-02-28  4:12     ` Daniel Phillips
2003-02-27 21:33       ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-13 21:04     ` [Ext2-devel] " Stephen C. Tweedie
2003-03-07 15:46 ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-08 17:38   ` Daniel Phillips
2003-03-07 23:27     ` Theodore Ts'o
2003-03-09 19:26       ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-09  7:08     ` Alex Tomas
2003-03-10 17:58       ` Daniel Phillips
2003-03-10 21:25       ` Theodore Ts'o
2003-03-11 21:57   ` Bill Davidsen
     [not found] ` <20030307214833.00a37e35.akpm@digeo.com>
     [not found]   ` <20030308010424.Z1373@schatzie.adilger.int>
2003-03-09 22:54     ` [Ext2-devel] " Daniel Phillips
2003-03-08 23:19       ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-09 23:10   ` Daniel Phillips
     [not found] ` <20030309184755.ACC80FCA8C@mx12.arcor-online.net>
     [not found]   ` <m3u1ecl5h8.fsf@lexa.home.net>
2003-03-10 20:45     ` [RFC] Improved inode number allocation for HTree Daniel Phillips
     [not found]       ` <3E6D1D25.5000004@namesys.com>
     [not found]         ` <20030311031216.8A31CEFD5F@mx12.arcor-online.net>
2003-03-11 10:45           ` Hans Reiser
2003-03-11 13:00             ` Helge Hafting
2003-03-11 13:41               ` Daniel Phillips
2003-03-11 17:16                 ` Andreas Dilger
2003-03-11 19:39                 ` Helge Hafting
2003-03-11 20:19                   ` Daniel Phillips
2003-03-11 21:25                 ` atomic kernel operations are very tricky to export to user space (was [RFC] Improved inode number allocation for HTree ) Hans Reiser
2003-03-11 23:49                   ` Jamie Lokier
2003-03-10 20:48     ` [RFC] Improved inode number allocation for HTree Daniel Phillips
2003-03-10 21:04       ` John Bradford
2003-03-10 21:28         ` Andreas Schwab
2003-03-10 21:50           ` Filesystem write priorities, (Was: Re: [RFC] Improved inode number allocation for HTree) John Bradford
2003-03-14 21:55             ` [Ext2-devel] " Stephen C. Tweedie
2003-03-10 21:33         ` [RFC] Improved inode number allocation for HTree Daniel Phillips
2003-03-10 21:47           ` [Ext2-devel] " Bryan O'Sullivan
2003-03-10 22:02             ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-03-11  8:47               ` Jakob Oestergaard
2003-03-11 11:27                 ` John Bradford
2003-03-14 21:57               ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2003-03-15  8:39                 ` jw schultz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='11490000.1046367063@[10.10.2.4]' \
    --to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®