mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
To: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com>
Cc: NetDEV list <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	mingo@elte.hu, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	"Linux-Kernel," <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.17-rc5-mm1 lockdep output
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 08:34:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1149143685.3115.6.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4807377b0605311704g44fe10f1oc54315276890071@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 17:04 -0700, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> well, when running e1000 through some code paths on FC4 +
> 2.6.17-rc5-mm1 + ingo's latest rollup patch, with this lockdep debug
> option enabled I got this:
> 
> e1000: eth1: e1000_watchdog_task: NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex
> 
> ======================================
> [ BUG: bad unlock ordering detected! ]
> --------------------------------------
> mDNSResponder/2361 is trying to release lock (&in_dev->mc_list_lock) at:
>  [<ffffffff81233f5a>] ip_mc_add_src+0x85/0x1f8
> but the next lock to release is:
>  (&im->lock){-+..}, at: [<ffffffff81233f52>] ip_mc_add_src+0x7d/0x1f8
> 
> other info that might help us debug this:
> 2 locks held by mDNSResponder/2361:
>  #0:  (rtnl_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff81253741>] mutex_lock+0x27/0x2c
>  #1:  (&in_dev->mc_list_lock){-.-?}, at: [<ffffffff81233f14>]
> ip_mc_add_src+0x3f/0x1f8

ok another out of order one in igmp ...


Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>

---
 net/ipv4/igmp.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux-2.6.17-rc5-mm1.5/net/ipv4/igmp.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.17-rc5-mm1.5.orig/net/ipv4/igmp.c
+++ linux-2.6.17-rc5-mm1.5/net/ipv4/igmp.c
@@ -1646,7 +1646,7 @@ static int ip_mc_add_src(struct in_devic
 		return -ESRCH;
 	}
 	spin_lock_bh(&pmc->lock);
-	read_unlock(&in_dev->mc_list_lock);
+	read_unlock_non_nested(&in_dev->mc_list_lock);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_IP_MULTICAST
 	sf_markstate(pmc);


  reply	other threads:[~2006-06-01  6:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-01  0:04 Jesse Brandeburg
2006-06-01  6:34 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2006-06-01  6:35 ` [patch, -rc5-mm1] lock validator: special locking: net/ipv4/igmp.c #2 Ingo Molnar
2006-06-02  6:47   ` Jesse Brandeburg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1149143685.3115.6.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org \
    --to=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®