From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751176AbWFFABV (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2006 20:01:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751178AbWFFABV (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2006 20:01:21 -0400 Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.150]:35793 "EHLO e32.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751176AbWFFABU (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2006 20:01:20 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.6.17-rc5-mm2 problem ? From: Badari Pulavarty To: Andrew Morton Cc: lkml In-Reply-To: <20060605114132.2f777060.akpm@osdl.org> References: <1149525461.26170.22.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com> <20060605114132.2f777060.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 17:02:58 -0700 Message-Id: <1149552178.26170.31.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 (2.0.4-4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 11:41 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 05 Jun 2006 09:37:40 -0700 > Badari Pulavarty wrote: > > > Have you seen this on 2.6.17-rc5-mm2 before ? Could be due to my > > patchset (fileop cleanups), but doesn't seem like it .. > > > > Thanks, > > Badari > > > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000008 > > RIP: > > [] skb_dequeue+0x2c/0x50 > > It could be the LLC bug. That thing caused untold amounts of grief. > > --- devel/net/llc/llc_input.c~git-net-llc-fix 2006-06-02 11:55:38.000000000 -0700 > +++ devel-akpm/net/llc/llc_input.c 2006-06-02 11:55:38.000000000 -0700 > @@ -176,7 +176,6 @@ int llc_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct > struct sk_buff *cskb = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC); > if (cskb) > rcv(cskb, dev, pt, orig_dev); > - rcv(skb, dev, pt, orig_dev); > } > dest = llc_pdu_type(skb); > if (unlikely(!dest || !llc_type_handlers[dest - 1])) > _ Thanks. 2.6.17-rc5-mm3 is behaving much better, haven't seen these issues on -mm3 with my patchset. I don't want to be the reason for breaking -mm tree with fileop changes (I already used up my free credits) ;) Thanks, Badari