From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751314AbWFFMcN (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2006 08:32:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751316AbWFFMcN (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2006 08:32:13 -0400 Received: from ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.57]:41921 "EHLO ms-smtp-03.nyroc.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751314AbWFFMcM (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2006 08:32:12 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.6.18 -mm pi-futex merge From: Steven Rostedt To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060604135011.decdc7c9.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20060604135011.decdc7c9.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 08:32:08 -0400 Message-Id: <1149597128.16247.40.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2006-06-04 at 13:50 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > pi-futex-futex-code-cleanups.patch > pi-futex-robust-futex-docs-fix.patch > pi-futex-introduce-debug_check_no_locks_freed.patch > pi-futex-introduce-warn_on_smp.patch > pi-futex-add-plist-implementation.patch > pi-futex-scheduler-support-for-pi.patch > pi-futex-rt-mutex-core.patch > pi-futex-rt-mutex-docs.patch > pi-futex-rt-mutex-docs-update.patch > pi-futex-rt-mutex-debug.patch > pi-futex-rt-mutex-tester.patch > pi-futex-rt-mutex-futex-api.patch > pi-futex-futex_lock_pi-futex_unlock_pi-support.patch > # > futex_requeue-optimization.patch > > Priority-inheriting futexes. I don't have a clue how this code works, > but it sure has a lot of trylocks for something which allegedly works. > Will merge. Andrew, I wrote the rt-mutex-design.txt just so you would have a clue :) If you have any questions, I would be happy to update it to make it clearer. -- Steve