From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932166AbWFFNpG (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2006 09:45:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932160AbWFFNpG (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2006 09:45:06 -0400 Received: from ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.56]:4588 "EHLO ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932166AbWFFNpF (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2006 09:45:05 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.6.18 -mm pi-futex merge From: Steven Rostedt To: Roman Zippel Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de In-Reply-To: References: <20060604135011.decdc7c9.akpm@osdl.org> <1149597128.16247.40.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 09:44:56 -0400 Message-Id: <1149601496.16247.56.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 15:34 +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > BTW what's the correct spelling - RT Mutex, rt mutex or rt-mutex? I'd recommend "RT Mutex" for when it is in titles (as it is now) and rt-mutex when explaining the code. IMO "rt mutex" is just wrong. -- Steve