mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Victor <andrew@sanpeople.com>
To: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alessandro.zummo@towertech.it,
	akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH[ RTC: Add rtc_year_days() to calculate tm_yday
Date: 08 Jun 2006 08:43:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1149749016.2114.26.camel@fuzzie.sanpeople.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060607193311.GH13165@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>

hi Russell,

> > RTC: Add exported function rtc_year_days() to calculate the tm_yday
> > value.
> 
> Is there a good reason for this?  I ask the question because the x86
> /dev/rtc driver says:
> 
>          * Only the values that we read from the RTC are set. We leave
>          * tm_wday, tm_yday and tm_isdst untouched. Note that while the
>          * RTC has RTC_DAY_OF_WEEK, we should usually ignore it, as it is
>          * only updated by the RTC when initially set to a non-zero value.
> 
> So it seems the established modus operandi for RTC interfaces is "don't
> trust wday, yday and isdst".

wday and yday are already being calculated by rtc_time_to_tm() in
drivers/rtc/rtc-lib.c, and this function is used by about half of the
RTC class drivers.

Since yday can also be easily calculated from dd/mm/yyyy, I don't see
why those drivers who don't use rtc_time_to_tm() can't also return a
valid yday value.


Regards,
  Andrew Victor



      parent reply	other threads:[~2006-06-08  6:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-07 18:26 Andrew Victor
2006-06-07 19:33 ` Russell King
2006-06-07 22:48   ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-06-08  6:43   ` Andrew Victor [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1149749016.2114.26.camel@fuzzie.sanpeople.com \
    --to=andrew@sanpeople.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=alessandro.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®