From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: "Sébastien Dugué" <sebastien.dugue@bull.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@plexity.net>
Subject: Re: 2.6.17-rc6-rt1
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 14:20:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1149855638.7413.8.camel@Homer.TheSimpsons.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1149853468.3829.33.camel@frecb000686>
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 13:44 +0200, Sébastien Dugué wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 13:35 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> >
> > I found xmms problem.
> >
> > [pid 8498] 12:53:49.936186 socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_IP <unfinished ...>
> > [pid 8498] 12:53:49.936551 <... socket resumed> ) = 9 <0.000301>
> > [pid 8498] 12:53:49.936774 fcntl64(9, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC <unfinished ...>
> > [pid 8498] 12:53:49.937287 <... fcntl64 resumed> ) = 0 <0.000465>
> > [pid 8498] 12:53:49.937451 setsockopt(9, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4 <unfinished ...>
> > [pid 8498] 12:53:49.937630 <... setsockopt resumed> ) = 0 <0.000110>
> > [pid 8498] 12:53:49.937893 connect(9, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(16001), sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}, 16 <unfinished ...>
> > [pid 8498] 12:56:58.902958 <... connect resumed> ) = -1 ETIMEDOUT (Connection timed out) <188.964934>
> >
> > which should have been...
> >
> > [pid 7385] 13:21:38.715146 socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 9 <0.000011>
> > [pid 7385] 13:21:38.715192 fcntl64(9, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0 <0.000007>
> > [pid 7385] 13:21:38.715237 setsockopt(9, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0 <0.000008>
> > [pid 7385] 13:21:38.715283 connect(9, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(16001), sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}, 16) = -1 ECONNREFUSED (Connection refused) <0.000060>
> >
> > So much for the easy part.
> >
>
> I'm starting to believe that it's network related. Pinging my box from
> a remote host gives a ~.3 ms round trip whereas pinging localhost gives
> ~500ms. Something real weird is going on here.
Wow. I don't see anything near 500ms, but I am dropping packets, and
recvmsg, when it isn't saying -EAGAIN, is indeed taking way too long.
14:04:02.062550 sendmsg(3, {msg_name(16)={sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(0), sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}, msg_iov(1)=[{"\10\0$@\217\36\0\2\262c\211D\35\364\0\0\10\t\n\v\f\r\16"..., 64}], msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 64 <0.000048>
14:04:02.062731 setitimer(ITIMER_REAL, {it_interval={0, 0}, it_value={10, 0}}, NULL) = 0 <0.000016>
14:04:02.062826 recvmsg(3, {msg_name(16)={sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(19889), sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}, msg_iov(1)=[{"E\0\0T\177]\0\0@\1\375I\177\0\0\1\177\0\0\1\0\0,@\217\36"..., 192}], msg_controllen=20, {cmsg_len=20, cmsg_level=SOL_SOCKET, cmsg_type=0x1d /* SCM_??? */, ...}, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 84 <0.037660>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-09 12:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-07 21:14 2.6.17-rc6-rt1 Ingo Molnar
2006-06-08 2:09 ` 2.6.17-rc6-rt1 Daniel Walker
2006-06-08 3:49 ` 2.6.17-rc6-rt1 Mark Knecht
2006-06-08 20:12 ` 2.6.17-rc6-rt1 Mark Knecht
2006-06-08 6:42 ` [PATCH -rt] Trivial compiler warning fix Jan Altenberg
2006-06-08 8:51 ` 2.6.17-rc6-rt1 Mike Galbraith
2006-06-08 19:52 ` 2.6.17-rc6-rt1 john stultz
2006-06-08 20:01 ` 2.6.17-rc6-rt1 Thomas Gleixner
2006-06-08 10:28 ` 2.6.17-rc6-rt1 Michal Piotrowski
2006-06-08 12:23 ` 2.6.17-rc6-rt1 Michal Piotrowski
2006-06-08 11:28 ` 2.6.17-rc6-rt1 Michal Piotrowski
2006-06-08 18:27 ` 2.6.17-rc6-rt1 Kevin Hilman
2006-06-08 19:03 ` 2.6.17-rc6-rt1 Thomas Gleixner
2006-06-08 23:57 ` 2.6.17-rc6-rt1 john stultz
2006-06-09 7:28 ` 2.6.17-rc6-rt1 Thomas Gleixner
2006-06-09 8:42 ` 2.6.17-rc6-rt1 Mike Galbraith
2006-06-09 10:12 ` 2.6.17-rc6-rt1 Sébastien Dugué
2006-06-09 11:35 ` 2.6.17-rc6-rt1 Mike Galbraith
2006-06-09 11:44 ` 2.6.17-rc6-rt1 Sébastien Dugué
2006-06-09 12:20 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2006-06-09 12:57 ` 2.6.17-rc6-rt1 Sébastien Dugué
2006-06-09 13:11 ` 2.6.17-rc6-rt1 Thomas Gleixner
2006-06-09 13:42 ` 2.6.17-rc6-rt1 Mike Galbraith
2006-06-09 14:31 ` 2.6.17-rc6-rt1 Thomas Gleixner
2006-06-09 15:55 ` 2.6.17-rc6-rt1 Daniel Walker
2006-06-09 18:41 ` 2.6.17-rc6-rt1 Mike Galbraith
2006-06-09 19:09 ` 2.6.17-rc6-rt1 Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1149855638.7413.8.camel@Homer.TheSimpsons.net \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=dsaxena@plexity.net \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sebastien.dugue@bull.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®