From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932505AbWFJXcm (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Jun 2006 19:32:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932522AbWFJXcl (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Jun 2006 19:32:41 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:35301 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932505AbWFJXcl (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Jun 2006 19:32:41 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] jffs2: fix section mismatches From: David Woodhouse To: "Randy.Dunlap" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org In-Reply-To: <20060610162945.b8823f6e.rdunlap@xenotime.net> References: <20060610132803.8909971c.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <1149976818.18635.153.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <20060610162945.b8823f6e.rdunlap@xenotime.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 00:32:48 +0100 Message-Id: <1149982369.18635.202.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 (2.6.2-1.fc5.1.dwmw2.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 16:29 -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > > For those exit-and-error functions, I think we actually want an > > __initexit marker. In the built-in case, it can actually be discarded > > with the init code. In the modular case, it needs to be kept. > > That sounds good, yes. In practice we could just use __init for it, until such time as we actually start discarding initcode from modules. -- dwmw2