From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161050AbWFKAoS (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Jun 2006 20:44:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161058AbWFKAoS (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Jun 2006 20:44:18 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:61098 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161050AbWFKAoR (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Jun 2006 20:44:17 -0400 Subject: Re: VGER does gradual SPF activation (FAQ matter) From: David Woodhouse To: Rik van Riel Cc: Matti Aarnio , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: <20060610222734.GZ27502@mea-ext.zmailer.org> <1149980791.18635.197.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 01:44:09 +0100 Message-Id: <1149986649.14664.1.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 (2.6.2-1.fc5.1.dwmw2.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 20:16 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: > Think about it for a second. Do you *really* want those > something@alumni.mit.edu people on lkml? :) I'd rather not exclude them by making ill-conceived, unilateral and incompatible changes to the way that SMTP email works. -- dwmw2