From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932289AbWFMWPY (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:15:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932286AbWFMWPY (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:15:24 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:51092 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932289AbWFMWPX (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:15:23 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] i386 syscall opcode reordering (pipelining) From: David Woodhouse To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: <20060613195446.GD24167@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de> <448F1B97.3070207@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 23:15:41 +0100 Message-Id: <1150236941.11159.125.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 (2.6.2-1.fc5.1.dwmw2.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 15:11 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > is anybody actually EVER using those??? > > I would think not.... > > Probably not. The _syscallN() macros are broken for the general case > on any 32-bit architecture, since they can't handle multiregister > arguments. In the -mm tree they're no longer visible outside ifdef __KERNEL__. -- dwmw2