From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932321AbWFNKbf (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jun 2006 06:31:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932324AbWFNKbf (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jun 2006 06:31:35 -0400 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:59594 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932321AbWFNKbe (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jun 2006 06:31:34 -0400 Subject: Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu() From: Alan Cox To: Andi Kleen Cc: discuss@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org, vojtech@suse.cz In-Reply-To: <200606140942.31150.ak@suse.de> References: <200606140942.31150.ak@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 11:47:21 +0100 Message-Id: <1150282041.3490.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 (2.6.2-1.fc5.5) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ar Mer, 2006-06-14 am 09:42 +0200, ysgrifennodd Andi Kleen: > Comments on the general mechanism are welcome. If someone is interested in using > this in user space for SMP or NUMA tuning please let me know. Will 2 words always be enough, it costs nothing to demand 8 or 16 ...