From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030288AbWFOMKx (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jun 2006 08:10:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030297AbWFOMKw (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jun 2006 08:10:52 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.de ([213.165.64.21]:4027 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1030288AbWFOMKw (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jun 2006 08:10:52 -0400 X-Authenticated: #14349625 Subject: Re: bad command responsiveness Proliant DL 585 From: Mike Galbraith To: david@dworf.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <449141F6.3090902@dworf.com> References: <448FC1CE.9090108@dworf.com> <1150278161.7994.13.camel@Homer.TheSimpsons.net> <449060EE.60608@dworf.com> <1150353862.8097.61.camel@Homer.TheSimpsons.net> <44910E5B.50704@dworf.com> <1150358450.8638.12.camel@Homer.TheSimpsons.net> <449141F6.3090902@dworf.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 14:14:32 +0200 Message-Id: <1150373673.7831.7.camel@Homer.TheSimpsons.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 13:18 +0200, David Osojnik wrote: > Well i tired cfq,anticipatory,deadline,no-op schedulers/elevators with > atime but none worked the only difference is when I use noatime and > nodiratime That's the result I expected. > could this be an kernel problem? Sure seems like one to me. Perhaps someone with a good understanding of journaling fs will comment. I can only speculate. -Mike