From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965076AbWFTIzt (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2006 04:55:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965225AbWFTIzt (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2006 04:55:49 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:50591 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965068AbWFTIzr (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2006 04:55:47 -0400 Subject: Re: batched write From: Steven Whitehouse To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Linux-Kernel@vger.kernel.org, Reiserfs-Dev@namesys.com, hch@infradead.org, vs@namesys.com, dgc@sgi.com, Hans Reiser In-Reply-To: <20060620002659.08aee963.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20060524175312.GA3579@zero> <44749E24.40203@namesys.com> <20060608110044.GA5207@suse.de> <1149766000.6336.29.camel@tribesman.namesys.com> <20060608121006.GA8474@infradead.org> <1150322912.6322.129.camel@tribesman.namesys.com> <20060617100458.0be18073.akpm@osdl.org> <20060619162740.GA5817@schatzie.adilger.int> <4496D606.8070402@namesys.com> <20060619185049.GH5817@schatzie.adilger.int> <20060620000133.GB8770394@melbourne.sgi.com> <4497A17C.50804@namesys.com> <20060620002659.08aee963.akpm@osdl.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Red Hat (UK) Ltd Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 10:02:53 +0100 Message-Id: <1150794173.3856.1305.camel@quoit.chygwyn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 (2.2.2-5) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 00:26 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 00:19:24 -0700 > Hans Reiser wrote: > > > So far we have XFS, FUSE, and reiser4 benefiting from the potential > > ability to process more than 4k at a time. Is it enough? > > Spose so. Let's see what the diff looks like? > - I have plans to do something along these lines for GFS2 in the future, so you can add that to the list as well, if that helps things along, Steve.