From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030300AbWFUVE0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jun 2006 17:04:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030307AbWFUVE0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jun 2006 17:04:26 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:47236 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030300AbWFUVEZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Jun 2006 17:04:25 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 1/6] cpu_relax(): interrupt.h From: Arjan van de Ven To: Andreas Mohr Cc: Andrew Morton , Nick Piggin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060621205932.GA22516@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de> References: <20060621205932.GA22516@rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 23:04:20 +0200 Message-Id: <1150923860.3057.116.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 22:59 +0200, Andreas Mohr wrote: > Add cpu_relax() to tasklet_unlock_wait() loop. > > > I kept barrier() since it is said to still be required, in various older > postings. cpu_relax() includes a barrier always, per definition. (simply because anywhere you would use cpu_relax() you would also put a barrier)