From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932851AbWFXFzl (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Jun 2006 01:55:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932852AbWFXFzl (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Jun 2006 01:55:41 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.de ([213.165.64.21]:4021 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932851AbWFXFzk (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Jun 2006 01:55:40 -0400 X-Authenticated: #14349625 Subject: Re: Measuring tools - top and interrupts From: Mike Galbraith To: danial_thom@yahoo.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060622165808.71704.qmail@web33303.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20060622165808.71704.qmail@web33303.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 07:59:23 +0200 Message-Id: <1151128763.7795.9.camel@Homer.TheSimpsons.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 09:58 -0700, Danial Thom wrote: > And 75K pps may not be "much", but its still at > least 10% of what the system can handle, so it > should measure around a 10% load. 2.4 measures > about 12% load. So the only conclusion is that > load accounting is broken in 2.6. For UP, yes. SMP kernel accounts irq processing time properly. -Mike