From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932752AbWF1HOW (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2006 03:14:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932753AbWF1HOW (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2006 03:14:22 -0400 Received: from www.osadl.org ([213.239.205.134]:32215 "EHLO mail.tglx.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932752AbWF1HOV (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2006 03:14:21 -0400 Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/mtd/devices/: remove dead _ecc code From: Thomas Gleixner Reply-To: tglx@linutronix.de To: Adrian Bunk Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060627131116.GL23314@stusta.de> References: <20060621215840.GP9111@stusta.de> <1150928664.25491.34.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060627131116.GL23314@stusta.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 09:16:25 +0200 Message-Id: <1151478985.25491.489.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 15:11 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > nand_ecc isn't dead code. > > But if I do understand correctly, you have pending patches to let the > code your patch made dead code and my patch would have removed be used > again? Ooops, sorry for shooting too fast. You're right I rendered that stuff dead unintentionally. But removing is not an option. I fix it proper Thanks tglx