From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932232AbWGBKsD (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Jul 2006 06:48:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932289AbWGBKsC (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Jul 2006 06:48:02 -0400 Received: from 142.163.233.220.exetel.com.au ([220.233.163.142]:12475 "EHLO idefix.homelinux.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932232AbWGBKsB (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Jul 2006 06:48:01 -0400 Subject: Suspend to RAM regression tracked down From: Jean-Marc Valin To: Linux Kernel Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Universit=E9?= de Sherbrooke Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 20:47:47 +1000 Message-Id: <1151837268.5358.10.camel@idefix.homelinux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, A while ago, I reported a suspend to RAM regression (fail to resume). I have since then tracked down the regression to the changes between 2.6.12-rc5-git5 and 2.6.12-rc5-git6. On my laptop, I have only been able to reproduce the problem with the ondemand cpufreq governor, but I've head of another user with the same (Dell D600) laptop having problem with the userspace governor as well. All the details are actually http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6166 but it seems like it's being ignored. It's currently assigned to the ACPI category, but maybe it belongs to cpufreq? Anyone can help here? Jean-Marc P.S. Please CC me since I'm not subscribed to the list.