From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751217AbWGBRcI (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Jul 2006 13:32:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751287AbWGBRcH (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Jul 2006 13:32:07 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:26242 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751217AbWGBRcG (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Jul 2006 13:32:06 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.6.17-mm5 -- Busted toolchain? -- usr/klibc/exec_l.c:59: undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail' From: Arjan van de Ven To: Miles Lane Cc: Andrew Morton , LKML In-Reply-To: References: <1151788673.3195.58.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1151789342.3195.60.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1151826131.3111.5.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 19:32:02 +0200 Message-Id: <1151861523.3111.19.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Does this mean that you don't want to see these fno-stack-protector > patches go into Andrew's tree? long term.. no. Because I want to enable stack-protector for the kernel (I have patches for that; all it needs is a 5 line gcc patch to make it work) as debug option at least (and if the perf impact isn't too bad, distros and security sensitive people can enable it always).