From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] scsi/io-elevator held lock freed.
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 17:13:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1152026010.3109.66.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1152024854.29262.5.camel@c-67-180-134-207.hsd1.ca.comcast.net>
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 07:54 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> I got this during boot. I booted the same kernel several times, and only
> saw it once. The kernel was 2.6.17-mm5 .
>
> Daniel
>
>
> =========================
> [ BUG: held lock freed! ]
> -------------------------
> swapper/1 is freeing memory f73a8580-f73a867f, with a lock still held there!
> 2 locks held by swapper/1:
> #0: (&shost->scan_mutex){--..}, at: [<c0419098>] mutex_lock+0x8/0x10
> #1: (&eq->sysfs_lock){--..}, at: [<c0419098>] mutex_lock+0x8/0x10
blargh.. it'd be more useful if lockdep actually printed which lock it
is that it thinks is about to get freed.....
this patch ought to make it do that; could you at least add this to your
kernel?
Ingo, is this the right approach?
---
kernel/lockdep.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.17-mm6/kernel/lockdep.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.17-mm6.orig/kernel/lockdep.c
+++ linux-2.6.17-mm6/kernel/lockdep.c
@@ -2571,7 +2571,7 @@ static inline int in_range(const void *s
static void
print_freed_lock_bug(struct task_struct *curr, const void *mem_from,
- const void *mem_to)
+ const void *mem_to, struct held_lock *hlock)
{
if (!debug_locks_off())
return;
@@ -2583,6 +2583,7 @@ print_freed_lock_bug(struct task_struct
printk( "-------------------------\n");
printk("%s/%d is freeing memory %p-%p, with a lock still held there!\n",
curr->comm, curr->pid, mem_from, mem_to-1);
+ print_lock(hlock);
lockdep_print_held_locks(curr);
printk("\nstack backtrace:\n");
@@ -2616,7 +2617,7 @@ void debug_check_no_locks_freed(const vo
!in_range(mem_from, lock_to, mem_to))
continue;
- print_freed_lock_bug(curr, mem_from, mem_to);
+ print_freed_lock_bug(curr, mem_from, mem_to, hlock);
break;
}
local_irq_restore(flags);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-04 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-04 14:54 Daniel Walker
2006-07-04 15:13 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2006-07-04 15:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-07-04 15:24 ` Daniel Walker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1152026010.3109.66.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org \
--to=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®